Tuesday, 30 March 2021

Irispublishers-Global Journal of Nutrition & Food Science (GJNFS)

 

Use of Pesticides on Crops and Its Impact on Health

Authored by  Cyril Kanmony J*

Opinion

Pesticides refer to agro-chemicals that are used for protecting plants from pests. Pesticides are classified into insecticidesfungicides, herbicides and others including plant-growth-regulators. Liberal use of agro-chemicals results in the presence of excess pesticide residues in the edible parts of plants and food grains. It is proved by many laboratory-based studies [1]. The indiscriminately sprayed pesticides and insecticides also results in the pollution of air, water and soil. Pollution reduces our life span by increasing our exposure to environment-related health hazards [2,3]. Further due to overuse of these poisonous pesticides and insecticides, these pests and insects become immune to these chemicals and become more dangerous than before. We use these poisonous chemicals to kill the damage-causing pests without knowing their impact on human health. They have the potential to kill not only pests and insects but also various beings including human beings. Why do then we use these poisonous agro-chemicals?

Pests, weeds and diseases destroy crops to the extent of 40% in developing countries. The net impact is a decline in the yield and output. In India, it is estimated at 35% to 45% [4]. Hence it is utmost necessity to control these damage-causing pests and insects to enhance production. But nobody bothers about the residues present in edible parts of plants and food grains that humans consume. A recent report published by All India Network Project on Pesticide Residues finds that residues of pesticides were found in 18.75% of samples tested. These samples include vegetables, cereals, pulses, egg, fish, meat, spices, tea, milk, and surface water. In some samples residues of multiple pesticides have been detected. Even mild doses also result in serious adverse health effects by getting accumulated in our body over a period. The most dangerous matter is that the diseases caused by these pesticides cannot be cured.

In European and other developed countries, all chemicals and bacteria are within the prescribed limit. But in India, there is no monitoring system to regulate the usage of these pesticides and insecticides and Indian farmers are uneducated and so they buy and use many pesticides without consulting field experts. They use them even in the absence of disease symptoms. It results in overusing of these agro-chemicals and consequently the presence of excess amount of pesticide residues in food items. They also use these pesticides carelessly without following the required protective measures as they don’t know the hazardous effects of pesticides. The production and consumption of these agro-chemicals, in India, is continuously increasing due to the patronage of governments though these agro-chemicals and chemical fertilizers were introduced in India only after Green Revolution to increase food production. Hence, the total food production in India increased from 82 million tonnes in 1960-1961 to 176 million tonnes in 1990-1991. The production of grains has reached an all-time high of 281 million tonnes in 2018-2019,

Even the usage of poisonous and hazardous pesticides and insecticides is not regulated. In India, as on 30.08.2016, 275 pesticides were registered for use. Of these 255 are chemical poisons and 115 are highly hazardous (Kumar and Narasimha 2017). In the supply of agro-chemicals, India stood at the 4th place after the US, Japan and China. India’s pesticides industry is the biggest in Asia and 12th in the world. The Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilisers (GOI 2019a) [5] reports show that the production of key pesticides increased from 186,490 MTs in 2014-2015 to 216,703 MTs in 2018-2019. The consumption also increased from 56,121 MTs in 2014-2015 to 62,183 MTs in 2017-2018. But the consumption of these chemicals was only 39,773 MTs in 2005-2006. Of the total pesticides consumed, nearly 70% is consumed by five States, namely: Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab and Haryana. Crop wise data show that more than 18% of pesticides are used on paddy, the most staple food of Indians and 50% on cotton. On an average, the consumption of pesticides in India is 0.29 kg/ ha. But it is as high as 0.74 kg in Punjab, 0.62 kg in Haryana and 0.57kg in Maharashtra and as low as 0.03 kg in Madhya Pradesh (GOI 2019) [6].

The presence of traces of dangerous pesticides that we use as pest-control chemicals creates many health problems. The most dangerous fact is that the diseases caused by these pesticides cannot be cured. The health problems range from short-term illnesses like headache and nausea to chronic impacts like cancer, reproductive harm and endocrine disruption. Long-term exposure to pesticides also leads to Parkinson’s diseases, asthma, depression and anxiety and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Children in comparison with adults breathe more air, eat more food and drink more water per unit of body weight and so among all the most vulnerable are children. A recent report points out that since 2005 there has been a general increase of 11% in ADHD, while there has been a 175% increase in cases among children between 3 and 17 years of age. The final consequence of the presence these pesticides in human body is death. It is reported that in developing countries nearly 800,000 people have died due to pesticides since the onset of Green Revolution and every year the death toll due to pesticide consumption through their food is about 2,000. There is also a continuous increase in the disease burden of human beings. Increase in ill-health results in increase in health-related expenditure [7].

It is our duty to keep the environment clear and the world intact for the future generation. The question here arises is: can our crops survive without using or at least without overusing these pesticides and insecticides? The simple answer for the question is: ‘yes’, andour crops can survive without these agro-chemicals. There are different methods to control these pests and insects. Some measures are sustainable and eco-friendly. The best method to stop the use pesticides is organic farming, in which most of the damage-causing pests and insects can be kept away from farms without creating any damage to the environment. For example, in Tamil Nadu, India, Nam Alwar, a perfect organic farmer, solved many problems of farmers without using any pesticide.


Monday, 29 March 2021

Irispublishers-Global Journal of Nutrition & Food Science (GJNFS)

 

Food and Nutrition Trends: Eternal Life or Our Extinction?

Authored by İsmail Hakkı Tekiner* 

Abstract

Four thousand years later, Gilgamesh’s story still tells us valuable things about meaning of life, our inescapable mortality, and fighting for eternal life. Since the end of the World War II, food industries and stakeholders have been writing again a contemporary Epic of Gilgamesh offering nutrition and health challenges as if alleged paradigm-shifting divinity.

Keywords: Food; Nutrition; Trend; Eternal life; Extinction; Health challenge; Paradigm; Paradox

Introduction

Gilgamesh and his beloved friend Enkidu start a journey to conquer the god Humbaba. Our heroes battle Humbaba and kill the god with the help of another god Shamash. Things go so badly, and Humbaba curses them before dying. Enkidu becomes sick and dies shortly after. Endiku’s death bludgeons Gilgamesh into making a second journey to discover the secret of eternal life, and then finds the magical plant of immortality. However, a serpent steals it. Eventually, Gilgamesh stops looking for youth-giving secret bows to the inevitable and goes back to Uruk in Mesopotamia to spend the rest of his life [1, 2].

The 1950s were a turning point, and clearly started transforming and re-orienting our food systems and societies. This transformation dramatically accelerating in the 1970s triggered mass-production and overconsumption, including food and nutrition systems, throughout the world by means of the neoliberal economic model [3].

Here we need to ask that question to ourselves; how food and nutrition systems evolved after the 1950s? After the end of the WW II, the stakeholders or neoliberal economic model in the need to generate profits intensively began to develop and implement new culture-based tools, including mass consumption, consumer, image, media cultures to be able to market newly invented products [4].

Lifestyles along with food and beverage purchase decisions in the world are mainly shaped by demographic changes, widespread electronic network, and shifting personal values. For instance, specialty foods and drinks are the third fastest-growing luxury category worldwide, after electronics and cars. Global consumers look for new products and solutions driving growth of health and wellness such as prevention of stress and anxiety, mild vision impairment, mental development, and gut health, and so on [5].

Interestingly, we see the reflections of this transformation in five Nobel Prizes Winners. Each made significant contributions to the history of food and nutrition such as; Pavlov on mammalian digestive systems, Eijkman and Hopkins on vitamins for health and disease prevention, Orr on equitable distribution of food and nutrition, Borlaug on disease-resistant crops to improved yields, and Amartya Sen on prevention or mitigation of famine [6]. This chronological order reveals that after 1945, Nobel Prizes also shifted from pure and health researches to economic, food and nutrition security related policies, as obviously seen.

We actually evaluate the probability of our species extinction from naturally occurring processes, as Snyder-Beattie et al. said. Such processes contain well-characterized risks such as asteroid impacts, super volcanic eruptions, mega earthquakes, and pandemic diseases as well as other risks that still remain unclear. However, However, Snyder-Beattie et al. warn us to focus on the risks from our own design rather than spending on existential risks. Being honest, many of today’s food production systems and nutrition trends compromise the capacity of our blue planet to meet the food needs in the future [7]. Food and nutrition trends don’t just have an impact on the human health, but also on the health of the Earth and all other existing species.

If so, what is the matter? Benjamin Franklin said, “we are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid”. His words would be assumed to be a call against ignorance in the solutions to food systems, which are becoming complex and challenging by time. It is a statement that given the evidence about the extinction caused by overconsumption in the planet, its climate, species and people, continuing to be ignorant equals sheer stupidity, and we do not need to be a genius to understand this. In this perspective, I see that each historical period reflects unique circumstances indeed. However, I criticize the final destination of food and nutrition trends in this era; eternal life or our inescapable mortality? even though the extinction is to some extent predictable.

We are entering an increasingly dangerous period of our history, as Stephen Hawking said. All we can say that Hawking’s comments could have come before the nutrition and health challenging Epic of today’s food and nutrition trends. This is a strange paradox, as Elizabeth A. Johnson says [8], and tells us strange things about eternal life such as gazing in wonder at Earth, and in contrary to, our inescapable mortality such as ravaging and depleting the natural world four thousand years later.

To read more about this article:https://irispublishers.com/gjnfs/fulltext/food-and-nutrition-trends-eternal-life-or-our-extinction.ID.000546.php

Indexing List of Iris Publishershttps://medium.com/@irispublishers/what-is-the-indexing-list-of-iris-publishers-4ace353e4eee

Iris publishers google scholar citations:

https://scholar.google.co.in/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=irispublishers&btnG=


Tuesday, 23 March 2021

Irispublishers-Global Journal of Nutrition & Food Science (GJNFS)

 

Sustainable Seafood Resources by Applying Industry 4.0: A Short Note

Authored by Chee Kong Yap* 

Short Communication

The First, Second, Third Industrial Revolutions started with the advent of steam and waterpower, electric power and mass manufacturing techniques, and information technology and automation, respectively [1,2]. The Fourth Industrial Revolution, known as Industry 4.0, is a much-discussed topic in the literature nowadays [1]. According to Industrial Internet Consortium (2017) [3], Industry 4.0 is defined as “the integration of complex physical machinery and devices with networked sensors and software, used to predict, control and plan for better business and societal outcomes”. When it is looked as a single interpretation of the above, it is rather difficult to connect how the application of the concept Industry 4.0 can help sustain the seafood natural resources from the coastal environment. Generation of economy with seafood products with high quality will certainly make a country to sustain its GDP per capital at the carrying capacity limit or can potentially exceeding it. The idea of this paper is grounded based on logical understanding between seafood sources and industry 4.0.

Managing sustainable coastal natural resources needs integration of three main elements namely economy, social and environmental perspectives. In the Goal #12 under United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs), the three keywords ‘Economy, Environmental and Social’ are mentioned [2]. This clearly shows the interconnection of the three components for sustainable development of a nation. Based on the papers [4] reviewed in this article, although there is no mention of ‘Food’, the food as a major source is actually under the keyword ‘Environmental’. Under UNSDGs, ‘increases in living standard for all people’ in the Goal #9 and ‘a better quality of life for all’ in the Goal #12, have an ecological interpretation of the important of food safety and security in sustaining both mentioned goals. Hence, the public could be misled when the Food is not seen under Goal #9 and Goal #12 under UNSDGs.

Industry is needed and essential for a nation for infrastructure development. The manufacturing industry is much needed to create novel invention and innovation of food packages in addition to nutritional values of the seafood such as the edible soft tissues of marine mussels that contain high level of protein and vitamins [5,6]. For example, the use of fish skins has been patented as a novel invention as a source of collagen for cosmetic purpose [7]. Later, may such related or modified methods of extraction or using other species of marine fished have been successfully patented and commercialized. This has positively created space and opportunities for fish market expansion in response to the collagen demand from the consumers. The data from the needs and demand from the public is highly subjective and become meaningless until there is high demand from the public. The fish suppliers will look for more sources of fish species enabling to high production of fish skin collagens for the cosmetic uses from consumer point of view. This has created a behavioural economic backbone to support the need of Industry 4.0, in which social factor is of paramount importance for coastal management [8].

Based on a Hungary case study, Nagy et al. (2018) reported that application of more efficient production processes can achieve a higher productivity in terms of increased economic sustainability Using the online questionnaire, the proportions of food industry (18.6%) was considered high. The word ‘food industry’ is therefore in the list of Internet of Things.

In conclusion, the security of seafood in quality and quantity is expected to be of high public concern in line with Industry 4.0 especially in Goal #9 and Goal #12 under UNSDGs. There are definite no doubt the natural seafood resources from the fragile coastal environment will determine the life quality of the human population. To sustain the well-being of the public, the sustainability of our coastal environment is not only our responsibility but also our mission to educate our next generations on how to sustain our coastal environment.



Friday, 19 March 2021

Irispublishers-Global Journal of Nutrition & Food Science (GJNFS)

 Article on Covid-19 related issue in Iris Publishers


COVID-19 pandemic is having many life-altering short and likely long-term effects. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on number of economical, ethical, legal, health services and social issues arise because of the virus rapidly spreading worldwide.  Most people infected with the COVID-19 virus will experience mild to moderate respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment.  Older people, and those with underlying medical problems like cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, and cancer are more likely to develop serious illness. The best way to prevent and slow down transmission of covid-19 is protecting yourself by wearing mask and others from infection by washing your hands frequently and not touching your face. Most of the people recover from the acute phase of the disease. However, some people continue to experience a range of effects for months after recovery and damage to organs has been observed. Multi-year studies are underway to further investigate the long-term effects of the disease.  

 Iris Publishers have focused and started a special issue on Covid-19 (Corona Virus). This issue mainly covers Quarantine measures, vaccine development during pandemic, Vaccination Side Effects, Immunity Simulation, Measuring the Covid-19 Pandemic, changing in Nursing Practice, Surgery during Covid-19, Global Impact of the Pandemic (COVID-19) on Construction Industry and so on, it is freely accessible to all the readers from the globe. The aim of this issue is to summarize the ethical information related to Covid-19 as we are going through coronavirus pandemic, and to estimate what we have seen thus far in view of this new knowledge. Iris Publishers strictly follows double bind peer review process by the Editors for better quality and relevance. We welcome all the authors from the globe to submit their original research articles, reviews, opinion, minireview, short communication and commentaries on Covid-19 (Corona Virus).

To read more about this article: https://irispublishers.com/COVID-19.php

Indexing List of Iris Publishershttps://medium.com/@irispublishers/what-is-the-indexing-list-of-iris-publishers-4ace353e4eee

Iris publishers google scholar citations:

https://scholar.google.co.in/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=irispublishers&btnG=

Wednesday, 17 March 2021

Irispublishers-Global Journal of Nutrition & Food Science (GJNFS)

 

Study of Nutrition Status of Population in Georgia

Authored by Robizon Tsiklauri*

Abstract

Background: Until 2015, systematic statistical data on micronutrient deficiency was not available in Georgia, to provide developing national strategy. In the same year, the National Centre for Disease Control and Public Health of Georgia (NCDC) in collaboration with the USA CDC launched the project “Strengthening surveillance of micronutrient deficiency in Georgia”.

Methodology: Sentinel surveillance approach was used by selecting 8 sentinel sites from 4 regions, 2 sites in each region (1 pediatric and 1 antenatal clinic). Folate and iron deficiencies were studied in pregnant women (1st trimester) and iron deficiency was measured in children (12- 23 months old). Ferritin concentration in plasma with cut-off points of <12 μg/l was used for Iron deficiency measure in toddlers, and <15 μg/l in pregnant. <3.0 ng/ml was considered as a cut-off point of Folate deficiency in pregnant. For anemia detection for the both target groups (children U2; pregnant) has been used Hb cut-off points of <11 g/l. Hemoglobin was tested using HemoQue and Multi-analyzer techniques at the sentinel sites.

Findings: In 2016-2017, Blood hemoglobin was measured among 939 children 12 to 23 months of age. 34% were anemic. Furthermore, 478 were tested for iron deficiency and 84% of them were identified as iron deficient. Hemoglobin was tested among 2,790 pregnant women and 7.4 % of them were found anemic. Additionally, 483 of 2,790 pregnant women were tested for iron and folate deficiencies. 61% were iron deficient, and 26.4% tested positive for folate deficiency. Neural tube defects (NTDs) prevalence per 1000 live births registered in sentinel sites was high 2.7.

Conclusion: Our preliminary results show that anemia and iron deficiency are prevalent among both pregnant women and children of the specified age group in Georgia. Additionally, folate deficiency was quite common during the 1st trimester of pregnancy. Our findings will inform public health policy decision makers to take relevant decisions on required interventions, such as health education, distribution of relevant supplements, and food fortification.

Introduction

Globally, micronutrient deficiencies affects approximately 2 billion people. Major morbidity and mortality are associated with vulnerable populations notably children under five and pregnant woman. Major micronutrient deficiencies include iron, folate and iodine [1]. In 2013, iron deficiency anemia affects 27% of the world’s population. More than 89% of the burden comprises low income countries. Iron-deficiency anemia causes more than 60% of anemia in the general population. Children under five and women of reproductive age are particularly vulnerable by anemia, which occurs when red blood cells are below the normal level.

Epidemiological studies for assessing the micronutrient status among the population in the South Caucasus region which includes Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia, are limited. Reports from Armenia (2000) estimated the prevalence of anemia to be 12 % and 12.4% among pregnant women and non-pregnant women, respectively and to be 23.9% in children under five [2].

A nationwide survey in Georgia reported prevalences of 22.8% anemic children, 25.6% in pregnant and 36.6% in non-pregnant women.

Iron is an essential element for the biosynthesis of blood hemoglobin. The symptoms of iron deficiency anemia can be mild at first and are not diagnosed until they have a routine blood test. Potential health complications of iron deficiency anemia include rapid or irregular heartbeat, pregnancy complications of premature birth or low birth weight, and delayed growth in infants and children [3].

Folate insufficiency manifests in neural tube defects (NTDs), which is caused by low concentration of vitamin B9 (folate) in blood. Approximately 190,000 neonates are born with NTD in low Income Countries. TDs are serious and most common consequence of folic acid deficiencies. NTDs occur when neural tube closure is completed by embryonic day 28 of pregnancy and arise when the neural tube cannot close properly. The most common NTDs are the following: anencephaly and spina bifida [4].

Potential target groups

Potential target groups for surveillance of micronutrient deficiency are infants, toddlers, preschool children, school-age children, and women of childbearing age (ref). Toddlers are vulnerable to micronutrient deficiencies, are accessible for the assessment in child health clinics and community surveys and are an indicator of risk in the general population. Surveillance of iron deficiency is focused on these vulnerable groups. In the present study women at the 1st trimester of pregnancy was studied.

Gap in knowledge

The last assessments of nutritional status have been done in Georgia in 2009 [5], but they do not contribute substantially to the estimation of nationwide prevalence rates of nutritional outcomes. Currently we are establishing national nutrition monitoring and surveillance system in Georgia (GNMSS). Findings of this could provide policy makers with reliable, valid data for developing national strategy of micronutrient deficiency elimination and improving the nutritional status of population.

Objectives of the study

Objective1- Determining the prevalence of micronutrient deficiency (anemia, iron) in children.

Objective 2- Determining the prevalence of micronutrient deficiency (anemia, iron, and folate) in pregnant women (Table 1-3).

Study design

The study focused on following population groups including toddlers (aged 12-23 months old), and pregnant. Selection of these target groups were based on level of risk or vulnerability, accessibility of the target group for assessment, and degree of representativeness, or the ability to reflect the extent of the problem in the overall population. Other criteria included the availability of normative data and the potential usefulness of the targeted population for surveillance of other micronutrient deficiencies.

Sites and population

With the support of USA CDC, in 2015, NCDC of Georgia launched collaborative project - “strengthening of micronutrient deficiency surveillance in Georgia”. We have selected 8 sentinel sites (2 sites in each region/children and pregnant health facilities) in four regions of Georgia (Tbilisi, Kakheti, Achara, and Samegrelo), using the criteria of geographical, social, ethnical, urban/rural, and religion. We also identified existing information about malnutrition and dietary habits from the above-mentioned regions. The project protocols were approved by the Institutional review board (IRB) at the NCDC and by the Research Review Committee and Ethical review committee of the US CDC.

Laboratory methods

1. After explaining the aim of the study (informal consent), a blood sample was collected from the anticubital vein in heparinized tube.

2. The sample for the test was taken from a vein and is placed in an appropriate test tube (a tube with granules and clot activator). Next, the sample is processed, and the serum is separated from the clot.

3. Iron deficiency in survey participants has been measured using ferritin concentration in serum. Ferritin was tested in serum using the ELISA method. Hemoglobin was measured at the sentinel sites.

4. Folate deficiency has been measured using serum folate concentration measured on serum separated from blood. Testing was done using an ELISA method and a microbiologic test kit (DRG International Inc., USA. BIO-4886).

Data analysis

The Statistic Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) was used for Data Analysis.

Results

The study in pregnant women showed 7.4% prevalence of anemia in 2790 pregnant enrolling in study; the percentage of iron deficiency in total (483 pregnant with Lab. study on ferritin) resulted in 61%). And 26.4% of folate deficiency in 483 pregnant (with Lab. study on folate) (Figure 1, Table 6). The study in children (12-23 months of age) showed 34% prevalence of anemia in 939 children enrolling in study; the percentage of iron deficiency in total (478 children with Lab. study on ferritin) resulted in 84%) In regards to regional profiles, we have detected that prevalence in toddlers in Samegrelo region (24.3%) anemia percentage is 1.5-2 times less than in other three regions, especially when comparing with Achara region (40.2%), which has the highest result compared to the other two regions (Kakheti with 40.3% and Tbilisi-30.0%). Total percentage for all four regions is 34% (Table 4, 5). Reviewing regional profiles for anemia in pregnant, showed that anemia prevalence in studied 4 regions is almost the same, and the percentage is around the 10% (7.4% in total), but we have a big differences in folate deficiency between Tbilisi and Achara regions (19.2% in Tbilisi vs 37.2% in Achara).

Discussion

This study surveyed micronutrient deficiencies of three nutrition indicators (iron, folate, and iodine) in three target groups (children of 12-23 months and 12years old children, and pregnant women in the first trimester). According to WHO/CDC guidelines (ref), the prevalence of anemia in children population is classified as a “moderate’’ public health threat (by the public health significance of deficiency), but in pregnant, we have prevalence of “mild’’ deficiency. In terms of the folate deficiency, prevalence is high in pregnant women. Comparing with other relevant studies, our data on anemia prevalence in children is 2.5 times higher than in Armenia but in childbearing women we have slightly lower prevalence (Table 7-12). Due to the project design, we could not define reasons of deficiency which require further investigation to determine proper intervention strategy.

Due to similar studies in similar context, we can assume that above mentioned deficiencies are caused due to possible reasons:

a) Georgian foods do not contain sufficient number of micronutrients.

b) “Formula’’ for toddlers’ nutrition does not contain the needed micronutrients that should meet physiological requirements of children after breastfeeding.

Limitations

This study has one main limitation: We defined the prevalence of Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA) and Folate Deficiency but could not investigate the reasons of the deficiency because, the study project did not include personal interviews on dietary habits.

Conclusion

After reviewing of preliminary analyses of the sentinel approach surveillance system’s 2 years (2016-2017yy) functioning results we can conclude that: we have anemia problem in children U2; Folate deficiency problem in pregnant; Iron deficiency problem, that is reflection of the general situation existing in Georgia. According to expert’s opinion it is the quite sufficient evidences for conclusion and recommendations for the initiation of nutrition interventions (mainly, food fortification) and for making the adequate changes/ amendments in relative legislation. Exception of provision of Children (6-23 months) from social unprotected families with Multimicronutrients powder.

Recommendations

a) Need to advocate for nutrition interventions regarding food fortification (with iron and folic acid) strategy.

b) Should implement one additional project for studying the dietary habits of population using standard questionnaires.

c) Promote the main principle of healthy eating.

d) In toddlers, special nutrition powder can be used to supplement feeding menus.



Tuesday, 16 March 2021

Irispublishers-Global Journal of Nutrition & Food Science (GJNFS)

 

Promoting Mucuna Beans Production for Soil Rehabilitation, Incomes, Food and Nutrition Security in Kenya

Authored by Mary Stella Wabwoba*

Abstract

This is a review paper of promotion of Mucuna Pruriens beans in western Kenya (Bungoma, Kakamega and Siaya counties). Mucuna is a leguminous plant grown in tropical woodlands. It is an emerging multiple use legume with the potential to restore soil structure, used as animal feed, as well as food/nutrition security in households. Due to its many uses, it was promoted for adoption by farmers in western Kenya. Families in western part of Kenya were food insecure in terms of protein insufficiency, crop productivity was low due to infertile soils and had low incomes within households. The adoption of Mucuna growing would solve the mentioned problems. Farmers were mobilized to grow the beans, process for food and for sell to earn income. The maize yield intercropped with Mucuna doubled in subsequent years. Various recipes were developed, tasted and adopted. The raw beans and processed products earned household’s income which improved livelihoods. The Mucuna beans production was therefore recommended for soil rehabilitation, income generation and for food and nutrition security within households.

Keywords: Mucuna beans; Soil rehabilitation; Incomes; Food and nutrition security

Abbreviations: GIZ: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH; CA: Conservation Agriculture; GOPA: Gesellschaft für Organization, Planung and Ausbildung; WHH: Welt Hunge Hilife; KALRO: Kenya Agriculture and Livestock Research Organization

Introduction

Mucuna prurien beans is a genus of around 100 accepted species of climbing lianas (vines) and shrubs of the family Fabaceae and typically found in tropical woodlands. The plant has a potential for multiple uses. According to Food and Agriculture Organization [1], Mucuna (Mucuna pruriens) has potential to restore soil as well as provide food. It is an emerging multiple-use leguminous crop [2] with high potential to enhance soil health and biodiversity. Mucuna bean (Mucuna pruriens) has been grown in Kenya for purposes of rehabilitating deteriorated soils, animal feeds as well as human food. Farmers in Western Kenya (Bungoma, Kakamega and Siaya counties) have grown Mucuna beans as a Conservation Agriculture (CA) crop. This crop when grown, it prevents soil deterioration and rehabilitate the affected areas, meaning it has the potential to restore soil structure [1]. Western Kenya counties in partnership with GIZ promoted the growing of Mucuna crop as a cover crop. A total of 325 (7500 individual farmers) farmer groups are actively involved in Mucuna production. On average 18,967 hectares of land were rehabilited by growing Mucuna beans crop today (Table 1). This explains why the beans have been promoted widely in these counties. Field reports indicated that crops grown on land that previously was under Mucuna or intercropped with it doubled yields. Accordingly, 50% grain-yield increase was reported at demonstration farms in maize grown under conservation agriculture systems in Kakamega, Bungoma and Siaya counties that used the Mucuna bean as an intercrop or rotation crop [3]. Soil is the most valuable and widespread natural resource that supports agricultural-based livelihoods. Soil in Western Kenya is highly degraded due to inappropriate farming practices such as overreliance on mineral fertilizer, erosion and inadequate rotation. Productivity levels of many crop enterprises is below potential, while the yield trends have either remained constant or are on the decline. Additionally, the soils have sub optimal nitrogen, organic matter, and low pH [4]. To get higher yields, farmers have often resorted to applying more and more inorganic fertilizers, thus high cost of production and accelerated soil pollution [1].

Mucuna bean, like other legume seeds, contains anti-nutritional compounds such as phytate, polyphenols, protease inhibitors and aromatic amino acids that cause physiological and biochemical effects including decreased protein digestibility plus growth inhibition in animals [5]. A variety of processing techniques such as soaking, heat treatment (boiling and roasting), have been used to remove anti-nutritional compounds and hence improve bean nutritional value [6]. Mucuna bean contains a major antinutritional compound, a non-protein amino acid, 3,4-dihydroxy-Lphenylalanine (L-Dopa) which must be removed before utilization [7]. There was lack of useful data in the Counties showing the nutritive value, recipes, various products from Mucuna crop. There was need for an elaborated training to equip the lead farmers with sufficient knowledge to pass on to others. This approach was used to make Mucuna production sustainable, generate income for households and contribute towards reducing food insecurity cases among households.

The Problem

Households in Bungoma County are food insecure because many families take one meal a day and more specifically men were reported to be malnourished due to protein deficit in their diets [8,4]. Mucuna is rich in protein but cannot be utilized without processing due to the presence of anti-nutritional compounds such as phytate, polyphenols, protease inhibitors and aromatic amino acids that cause physiological and biochemical effects including decreased protein digestibility, growth inhibition in animals. Mucuna bean contains a major anti-nutritional compound, a non-protein amino acid, 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine-L-Dopa [9]. Survey reports showed that, there was lack of useful data in the survey Counties to show the nutritive value, recipes, various products from Mucuna prurien beans. The impact on the yield of crop intercropped with Mucuna beans was not established. Field reports revealed that farmers wished to utilize the Mucuna beans but lacked knowledge on how to process the beans into palatable forms [10]. Therefore, it was necessary for an elaborated training to equip the lead farmers with sufficient knowledge to pass on to others. This approach was used to make Mucuna production sustainable and would contribute towards reducing food insecurity cases among households.

Objectives

• To assess the impact of Mucuna as a cover crop on agricultural productivity of arable land while conserving the soil resources through innovative farming practices.

• To capacity build extension staff and farmers on how to process the beans to remove the Ant-nutritional Factors (L-Dopa and other anti-nutrients) and develop home grown recipes in combination with locally available foods to increase food security.

• To empower farmers with business skills to value add and market Mucuna products as an income generating activity (IGA) to increase incomes and improve livelihoods.

Methodology

The survey targeted agriculture extension officers and farmer groups and individuals growing Mucuna beans. To achieve the above objectives, First, the GIZ project staff from Bungoma, Kakamega and siaya Counties mobilized agricultural extension staff both from public and NGOs/organizations, who were involved in promotion of Mucuna as cover crop for conservation agriculture in the GIZ/GOPA Soil Protection and Rehabilitation programme, for purpose of this survey. The extension staff undertook a training for two days after which they each trained farmer within their wards on the same. Secondly, farmer groups from Bungoma, Kakamega and Siaya counties were mobilized and sensitised on growing of Mucuna beans as a cover crop to rehabilitate the degraded soils. Farmers were given Mucuna beans to grow on their farms as an intercrop with maize and the maize yields compared [3]. Thirdly, the lead farmers were trained on how to process the beans to remove ANF, developed recipes alongside locally available foods. The delivery methods of training involved presentations, cooking demonstrations and group discussions. Finally, farmers were taught entrepreneurial skills to sell the Mucuna products to earn incomes.

Results and Discussions

Effect of Mucuna intercrop on maize yield

Mucuna cover cropping was introduced to farmers in Western Kenya counties – Bungoma,Kakamega and Siaya to solve problem of soil erosion and infertility. It was a project by Giz-funded by German government. It was originally proposed to farmers for soil fertility improvement on poorly degraded soils. A survey was conducted during the 2014 growing season of 20 farmers who were exposed to the technology over a period of five years. The results showed that 50 percent of the participating farmers used the technology for at least three consecutive years. At first, the technology met a lot of resistance but later, after seeing the increase in the maize yields from the fields that had Mucuna, many farmers picked up the practice [3]. The maize yield increased from 5bags per acre to 60bags per acre in the fifth year of practice (Figure 1). This result is comparable with what was found in other parts of the world. According to Jonathan et al [2], use of Mucuna interventions in agro-systems revitalized land by improving soil fertility for crop cultivation. As nitrogen-fixing legume, it was reported to improve maize yield by between 200 kg and 800 kg/acre after a one-year fallow [11]. As cover crop, mucuna has a positive effect on soil moisture retention [12] and hence yield increase. Conclusions about the future viability of mucuna cover cropping may be drawn from an economic analysis based on some of the yield and adoption data. It indicated that positive returns are achieved at farmer levels in the second year after adopting mucuna. It was observed that adoption of mucuna saves the farmer from using organic fertilizers as the soils become fertile.

Uses of Mucuna (Food and Nutrition Security)

Mucuna has three main uses: food, feed (forage and seeds) and environmental management - cover crop and green manure [13]. It is used as a coffee substitute [14]. The Mucuna showed good potential to do well in a stressed environment and low soil fertility that does not allow most other food legumes. It is suitable in intercropping systems [15], especially in Western Kenya, where maize is staple crop, plus millet, sorghum and sugarcane. Mucuna vines and foliage can be used as pasture, hay or silage while pods and seeds can be ground into a meal and fed to livestock [16].

Mucuna has three main uses: food, feed (forage and seeds) and environmental management - cover crop and green manure [13]. It is used as a coffee substitute [14]. The Mucuna showed good potential to do well in a stressed environment and low soil fertility that does not allow most other food legumes. It is suitable in intercropping systems [15], especially in Western Kenya, where maize is staple crop, plus millet, sorghum and sugarcane. Mucuna vines and foliage can be used as pasture, hay or silage while pods and seeds can be ground into a meal and fed to livestock [16].

Home processed Mucuna beans recipes

Extension staff from wards that had large acres under mucuna of the county were trained on processing and utilization of Mucuna [10]. This enabled them to effectively guide the lead farmers during on - farm trainings within groups. The training content focused on processing methods, nutritive value, development of various recipes and utilization of Mucuna products. Entrepreneurial skills, market linkages and networking, among others [18]. This was followed by onfarm training of lead farmers on processing and utilization of Mucuna. This training targeted individual farmers and farmer groups involved in Mucuna production who were drawn from subcounties. A Face to Face or Farmer to Farmer(F-F) model of on-farm training was adopted for effective understanding. Herein are some of the recipes which were developed, tasted and adopted.

General method of removing anti-nutritional factors (anfs) at home

1. Sort out and clean the harvested dried Mucuna beans.

2. Soak for 24 hours while changing water 3 times

3. Boil for 4 to 5 hours as you frequently change the water.

4. De-husk the beans (Husks can be fed to livestock while cotyledon for human)

5. The beans can be dried and can be used in various ways:

a) Boiled together with other foods

b) Milled into flour

c) Roasted until brown or dark brown then milled into powder- beverage

Mucuna Recipes

Trainees were divided into groups and developed various products, ranging from Mucuna Beverage, Mucuna/ wheat flour cake, Mucuna ugali(maize/millet), Mucuna – banana relish, Mucuna- potato mash, Mucuna-Maize dish, Mucuna / wheat flour Chapati, Mucuna mandazi, Mucuna Pilau, crackies, Nutri porridge, cakes (Figure 2).

Mucuna crackies (Figure 3)

Ingredients

Mucuna flour: 1 cup

Wheat flour: 3 cups

Sugar: 4 tbs

Sugar: 4 tbs

Salt to taste Cooking oil: just enough for deep fry

Mixed Spices: 2tbs water to make the dough

Method

• Mix all the dry ingredients in a bowl

• Add margarine, water and knead to make the dough

• Squeeze the dough through the noddle machine onto the hot oil

• Remove when golden brown

Mucuna Stew

Ingredients

1kg dehusked Mucuna beans

Cooking salad

Spices

Onions and tomatoes

Method

• Boil the beans until soft.

• Blend the beans to make a thick puree.

• Fry onions add tomatoes and spices then add the beans.

• Continue to boil while stirring till it’s ready

• Serve with rice, chapatti or sweet potatoes

Mucuna Chapati (Figure 4)

Ingredients

Mucuna flour: 1 cup

Wheat flour: 3cups

Cooking salad oil and Salt to taste

Method

• Add 1cup mucuna flour to 3 cups wheat flour.

• Add a little salt to taste

• Kneed the mixture to make chapatti dough

• Cook as we cook chapatti

Mucuna Mash (Mafuke)

Ingredients

6 medium size sweet potato

1cups boiled dehusked Mucuna beans

2 bunches of pumpkin leaves (optional)

1 teaspoon of margarine

Salt to taste

Method

4. Peel potatoes and chop into small pieces

5. Add to boiled dehusked Mucuna beans and salt to taste

6. Boil till all the food staffs are well cooked

7. Drain excess water, add margarine and mash to a smooth texture

8. Serve when hot with sour milk or fresh fruit juice

Mucuna Bean Beverage (Figure 5)

Ingredients

Dry Mucuna beans

Method

• Sort out and clean the dry Mucuna beans.

• Soak for 24 hours while changing water 3 times

• Boil for 2 to 3 hours as you frequently change the water

• Drain the water and dry in the sun

• Pan roast the beans until dark brown (or if Electric roaster, set at Temp- 150o C for 50 minutes)

Mucuna Food Mix

Ingredients

Dry Mucuna beans

Method

• Sort out and clean the dry mucuna beans.

• Soak for 24 hours while changing water 3 times

• Boil for 2 to 3 hours as you frequently change the water three times.

• Drain the water and dry in the sun

• Pan roast the beans until brown (or if electric roaster, set at Temp- 150o C for 25 minutes)

• Grind into fine powder/flour (this can be used to enrich other foods)

• Mix the flour with any food additive of your choice and this can be used to thicken soups

Mucuna as an Income Generating Activity (IGA)

Farmers adopting mucuna cover cropping benefited from higher yields of maize with less labour for weeding. Many of the early adopters also earned additional revenue by selling Mucuna seed as the technology was disseminated. Some farmers after the training, picked up processing the Mucuna powder which is used as a beverage for sale. Due to its medicinal value and health benefits, Mucuna beverage sells like hot cakes in the region and it generates income to the families.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Mucuna beans like any other legume is a rich source of proteins and therefore can supplement proteins in the diet. Mucuna can be a source of income to households and hence improve livelihoods. Soil nutrient management should thus be integrated with mucuna residue supplemented with moderate amounts of inorganic fertilizer for high crop yields. Mucuna fallowing has additional benefits, such as soil erosion control and maintenance or improvement of the soil’s physical, chemical and biological properties. Mucuna beans should be adopted for soil rehabilitation, food and nutrition security and income generation.